GPU wars: How crypto miners became AI infrastructure

Maxim Orlov · 15.01.2026, 18:07:10

GPU wars: How crypto miners became AI infrastructure


Author: Maxim Orlov | Infrastructure Specialist | Former VP of Operations at Hive Blockchain

September 2022. Ethereum switches to proof-of-stake. Overnight, billions of dollars in GPU mining hardware becomes obsolete. Mining farms that had been printing money are suddenly burning cash. The great GPU apocalypse begins.

Except it wasn't an apocalypse. It was a transformation. The same hardware that mined ETH is now training AI models. The same facilities that powered blockchain now power machine learning. Crypto miners didn't die — they evolved.

The hardware reality

Let me explain why this transition was possible.

Ethereum mining used GPUs. Not ASICs like Bitcoin — general-purpose graphics cards that could run any parallel computation. Mining farms accumulated massive GPU inventories. RTX 3080s, 3090s, AMD equivalents. Thousands, sometimes tens of thousands of cards per facility.

AI training also uses GPUs. The same parallel processing architecture that made GPUs good for mining makes them good for matrix multiplication — the core operation in neural networks. Different software, same hardware.

The infrastructure overlaps too. Power delivery, cooling systems, networking, physical security — a mining facility has everything an AI data center needs. The facilities were purpose-built for high-density GPU compute. That's exactly what AI requires.

When the merge happened, smart operators didn't sell their hardware at fire-sale prices. They pivoted.

The pivot economics

Here's what the numbers looked like at my former company.

Pre-merge, a single RTX 3090 generated roughly $3-5 per day mining ETH. We had 15,000 cards across three facilities. Do the math — serious revenue.

Post-merge, that same card generated $0.30 per day mining whatever altcoins remained profitable. Not even enough to cover electricity in most locations. The mining economics collapsed.

But that same RTX 3090 could rent for $0.40-0.80 per hour on AI compute marketplaces. Running 20 hours a day, that's $8-16 per day — better than mining ever was, with more predictable revenue.

The catch: AI workloads have different requirements. Lower temperatures for reliability. Better networking for distributed training. More sophisticated job scheduling. The transition required investment, but the payoff was there.

What miners brought to AI

Crypto miners contributed things the AI industry desperately needed.

Scale, immediately available. The AI compute shortage is real. Companies wait months for NVIDIA allocations. Cloud providers are sold out. Miners had thousands of GPUs sitting idle. They became instant supply.

Power infrastructure is the hidden constraint. Building new data centers takes years, largely because securing power takes years. Mining facilities had already solved this — they'd negotiated power contracts, built substations, installed transformers. That infrastructure transferred directly.

Geographic diversity matters for AI. Distributed training benefits from multiple locations. Miners had built facilities wherever power was cheap — Quebec, Texas, Kazakhstan, Iceland. That geographic spread became an asset for global AI deployment.

Operational expertise transferred. Running thousands of GPUs 24/7, managing failures, optimizing for uptime — miners had years of experience. The problems are similar even when the workloads differ.

The hardware gap

Let me be honest about limitations.

Consumer GPUs aren't data center GPUs. An RTX 3090 has 24GB VRAM. An H100 has 80GB. For training large language models, that difference is enormous. You can't fit GPT-4 on consumer cards, period.

Interconnects matter for training. Consumer GPUs connect via PCIe. Data center GPUs use NVLink with 10x the bandwidth. Distributed training on consumer hardware is possible but slower and less efficient.

Reliability differs. Consumer cards aren't rated for 24/7 operation at full load. They fail more often. They need more cooling. Enterprise support doesn't exist. Operators factor in higher failure rates.

The result: former mining hardware is excellent for inference, fine-tuning, and smaller-scale training. It's not competitive for frontier model training. That's still dominated by hyperscalers with H100 clusters.

The new business models

Converted mining operations now run several types of businesses.

Render farms serve creative industries. Visual effects, 3D animation, architectural visualization — all GPU-intensive, all tolerant of geographic distribution. Companies like Render Network aggregate former mining capacity for rendering workloads.

AI inference services run trained models. Inference is less demanding than training — smaller memory requirements, more tolerant of latency. Former mining hardware handles inference economically for mid-tier models.

Fine-tuning services help companies customize base models. Take Llama, fine-tune on company data, deploy. This requires serious compute but not H100-level hardware. Former mining operations compete well here.

Research compute serves academics and startups. Not everyone needs frontier capabilities. Many research projects run fine on consumer-grade hardware at lower prices than cloud providers.

The decentralization angle

Here's where crypto and AI converge interestingly.

Centralized AI compute is a problem. Amazon, Google, Microsoft control most cloud GPU capacity. NVIDIA controls the hardware supply. A few companies gatekeep who can build AI.

Distributed former-mining infrastructure offers an alternative. Thousands of independent operators with GPU capacity. No single point of control. Censorship-resistant compute for AI applications that hyperscalers might refuse to host.

Projects like Akash, Render, and io.net build marketplaces connecting this distributed supply to AI demand. Token incentives coordinate participants. Smart contracts handle payments and disputes. The crypto infrastructure enables the AI marketplace.

It's poetic, really. Crypto mining created the hardware base. Crypto tokens create the coordination layer. The industries evolved together and remain intertwined.

What I'm seeing now

Current market dynamics from my perspective.

Utilization rates are climbing. Early post-merge, converted facilities struggled to find customers. Now, with AI demand exploding, utilization exceeds 80% at well-run operations. The demand caught up.

Hardware is being upgraded. Operators who proved the model works are reinvesting. Replacing consumer cards with professional ones. Adding NVLink capabilities. Improving networking. The facilities are evolving toward data center standards.

Consolidation is happening. Small operators can't compete on reliability or scale. Larger players are acquiring facilities and standardizing operations. The industry is professionalizing.

New entrants are building purpose-built. The conversion opportunity taught people the business model. Now companies are building AI-first facilities with mining-style economics — cheap power locations, high-density design, distributed architecture.

The future trajectory

My predictions for this space.

Former mining operations become a permanent part of AI infrastructure. Not the frontier tier — that stays with hyperscalers. But a meaningful mid-tier serving inference, fine-tuning, research, and cost-sensitive training.

The decentralized compute networks mature. Better scheduling, better reliability, better tooling. They become genuine alternatives to cloud providers for appropriate workloads.

Geographic arbitrage continues. AI compute will follow cheap power, just like mining did. Expect facilities in Iceland, Norway, Paraguay, anywhere with stranded renewable energy.

The hardware upgrade cycle accelerates. As consumer GPUs become less competitive, operators will need to invest in professional hardware or exit. The shakeout is coming.

The merge was supposed to kill GPU mining operations. Instead, it forced them to evolve into something more valuable. The AI industry is better for it. So are the operators who made the transition.

Maxim Orlov advises former mining operations on AI infrastructure transitions. He previously served as VP of Operations at Hive Blockchain and built GPU facilities across North America.

#Crypto


Related posts

Restaking: Risks and opportunities post-EigenLayer
Centralized exchanges: Lessons two years after FTX
Scroll down to load next post