A brief message circulating online claims that the AI assistant Claude monitors users while they write code in their editors.

Message and context

The original short statement was presented without attribution or supporting evidence, and requires verification before it can be treated as factual.

Readers should be cautious about accepting such claims without further documentation from credible sources or technical disclosure about the assistant's telemetry.

«Claude watches you code manually»

Technical considerations

AI code assistants can operate locally, through cloud services, or via editor plugins, with data access depending on deployment and configuration choices.

Whether an assistant records keystrokes, monitors file changes, or collects usage analytics depends on explicit permissions and implemented telemetry policies.

Privacy and transparency

Transparency about data collection and retention is central to assessing any monitoring claim related to development workflows and team practices.

Users and organizations should consult terms of service, privacy policies, and product documentation to establish what information the assistant may access or transmit.

Practical guidance

To reduce exposure, consider the following measures when evaluating or using code-assistance tools.

• Review the assistant's privacy settings and disable any telemetry options that are not strictly necessary for coding assistance.
• Limit plugin or extension permissions within editors to prevent unintended access to local files and running processes.
• Prefer local or on-premises deployments when confidentiality of source code is a priority for teams or projects.
• Monitor network activity and consult logs to confirm what endpoints the assistant communicates with during active coding sessions.

Given the lack of corroborating details for the initial claim, independent verification and careful review of product documentation are recommended before drawing conclusions.